Test ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Simulator Free - Flexible ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Learning Mode

We have 24/7 Service Online Support services, and provide professional staff Remote Assistance at any time if you have questions on our ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager exam braindumps. Besides, if you need an invoice of our ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager practice materials please specify the invoice information and send us an email. Online customer service and mail Service is waiting for you all the time. And you can download the trial of our ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager training engine for free before your purchase.

PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic	Details
Topic 1	Fundamental Principles and Concepts of Information Security Risk Management: This domain covers the essential ideas and core elements behind managing risks in information security, with a focus on identifying and mitigating potential threats to protect valuable data and IT resources.
Topic 2	Information Security Risk Management Framework and Processes Based on ISO IEC 27005: Centered around ISO IEC 27005, this domain provides structured guidelines for managing information security risks, promoting a systematic and standardized approach aligned with international practices.
Topic 3	Implementation of an Information Security Risk Management Program: This domain discusses the steps for setting up and operationalizing a risk management program, including procedures to recognize, evaluate, and reduce security risks within an organization’s framework.
Topic 4	Other Information Security Risk Assessment Methods: Beyond ISO IEC 27005, this domain reviews alternative methods for assessing and managing risks, allowing organizations to select tools and frameworks that align best with their specific requirements and risk profile.

>> Test ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Simulator Free <<

Flexible ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Learning Mode | Pdf ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Exam Dump

As the authoritative provider of ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager guide training, we can guarantee a high pass rate compared with peers, which is also proved by practice. Our good reputation is your motivation to choose our learning materials. We guarantee that if you under the guidance of our ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager study tool step by step you will pass the exam without a doubt and get a certificate. Our learning materials are carefully compiled over many years of practical effort and are adaptable to the needs of the exam. We firmly believe that you cannot be an exception. Choosing our ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Exam Questions actually means that you will have more opportunities to be promoted in the near future. If you eventually fail the exam, we will refund the fee by the contract. We are confident that in the future, our ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager study tool will be more attractive and the pass rate will be further enhanced.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager Sample Questions (Q30-Q35):

NEW QUESTION # 30
Scenario 6: Productscape is a market research company headquartered in Brussels, Belgium. It helps organizations understand the needs and expectations of their customers and identify new business opportunities. Productscape's teams have extensive experience in marketing and business strategy and work with some of the best-known organizations in Europe. The industry in which Productscape operates requires effective risk management. Considering that Productscape has access to clients' confidential information, it is responsible for ensuring its security. As such, the company conducts regular risk assessments. The top management appointed Alex as the risk manager, who is responsible for monitoring the risk management process and treating information security risks.
The last risk assessment conducted was focused on information assets. The purpose of this risk assessment was to identify information security risks, understand their level, and take appropriate action to treat them in order to ensure the security of their systems. Alex established a team of three members to perform the risk assessment activities. Each team member was responsible for specific departments included in the risk assessment scope. The risk assessment provided valuable information to identify, understand, and mitigate the risks that Productscape faces.
Initially, the team identified potential risks based on the risk identification results. Prior to analyzing the identified risks, the risk acceptance criteria were established. The criteria for accepting the risks were determined based on Productscape's objectives, operations, and technology. The team created various risk scenarios and determined the likelihood of occurrence as "low," "medium," or "high." They decided that if the likelihood of occurrence for a risk scenario is determined as "low," no further action would be taken. On the other hand, if the likelihood of occurrence for a risk scenario is determined as "high" or "medium," additional controls will be implemented. Some information security risk scenarios defined by Productscape's team were as follows:
1. A cyber attacker exploits a security misconfiguration vulnerability of Productscape's website to launch an attack, which, in turn, could make the website unavailable to users.
2. A cyber attacker gains access to confidential information of clients and may threaten to make the information publicly available unless a ransom is paid.
3. An internal employee clicks on a link embedded in an email that redirects them to an unsecured website, installing a malware on the device.
The likelihood of occurrence for the first risk scenario was determined as "medium." One of the main reasons that such a risk could occur was the usage of default accounts and password. Attackers could exploit this vulnerability and launch a brute-force attack. Therefore, Productscape decided to start using an automated "build and deploy" process which would test the software on deploy and minimize the likelihood of such an incident from happening. However, the team made it clear that the implementation of this process would not eliminate the risk completely and that there was still a low possibility for this risk to occur. Productscape documented the remaining risk and decided to monitor it for changes.
The likelihood of occurrence for the second risk scenario was determined as "medium." Productscape decided to contract an IT company that would provide technical assistance and monitor the company's systems and networks in order to prevent such incidents from happening.
The likelihood of occurrence for the third risk scenario was determined as "high." Thus, Productscape decided to include phishing as a topic on their information security training sessions. In addition, Alex reviewed the controls of Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 in order to determine the necessary controls for treating this risk. Alex decided to implement control A.8.23 Web filtering which would help the company to reduce the risk of accessing unsecure websites. Although security controls were implemented to treat the risk, the level of the residual risk still did not meet the risk acceptance criteria defined in the beginning of the risk assessment process. Since the cost of implementing additional controls was too high for the company, Productscape decided to accept the residual risk. Therefore, risk owners were assigned the responsibility of managing the residual risk.
Which risk treatment option was used for the second risk scenario? Refer to scenario 6.

A. Risk sharing
B. Risk avoidance
C. Risk retention

Answer: A

Explanation:
Risk sharing, also known as risk transfer, involves sharing the risk with another party, such as through insurance or outsourcing certain activities to third-party vendors. In Scenario 6, Productscape decided to contract an IT company to provide technical assistance and monitor the company's systems and networks to prevent incidents related to the second risk scenario (gaining access to confidential information and threatening to make it public unless a ransom is paid). This is an example of risk sharing because Productscape transferred part of the risk management responsibilities to an external company. Thus, the correct answer is C, Risk sharing.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27005:2018, Clause 8.6, "Risk Treatment," which includes risk sharing as an option where a third party is used to manage specific risks.

NEW QUESTION # 31
Scenario 5: Detika is a private cardiology clinic in Pennsylvania, the US. Detika has one of the most advanced healthcare systems for treating heart diseases. The clinic uses sophisticated apparatus that detects heart diseases in early stages. Since 2010, medical information of Detika's patients is stored on the organization's digital systems. Electronic health records (EHR), among others, include patients' diagnosis, treatment plan, and laboratory results.
Storing and accessing patient and other medical data digitally was a huge and a risky step for Detik a. Considering the sensitivity of information stored in their systems, Detika conducts regular risk assessments to ensure that all information security risks are identified and managed. Last month, Detika conducted a risk assessment which was focused on the EHR system. During risk identification, the IT team found out that some employees were not updating the operating systems regularly. This could cause major problems such as a data breach or loss of software compatibility. In addition, the IT team tested the software and detected a flaw in one of the software modules used. Both issues were reported to the top management and they decided to implement appropriate controls for treating the identified risks. They decided to organize training sessions for all employees in order to make them aware of the importance of the system updates. In addition, the manager of the IT Department was appointed as the person responsible for ensuring that the software is regularly tested.
Another risk identified during the risk assessment was the risk of a potential ransomware attack. This risk was defined as low because all their data was backed up daily. The IT team decided to accept the actual risk of ransomware attacks and concluded that additional measures were not required. This decision was documented in the risk treatment plan and communicated to the risk owner. The risk owner approved the risk treatment plan and documented the risk assessment results.
Following that, Detika initiated the implementation of new controls. In addition, one of the employees of the IT Department was assigned the responsibility for monitoring the implementation process and ensure the effectiveness of the security controls. The IT team, on the other hand, was responsible for allocating the resources needed to effectively implement the new controls.
Based on scenario 5, the decision to accept the risk of a potential ransomware attack was approved by the risk owner. Is this acceptable?

A. No, the risk treatment plan should be approved by the top management and implemented by risk owners
B. Yes, the risk treatment plan should be approved by the risk owners
C. No, all interested parties should approve the risk treatment plan

Answer: B

Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27005, the risk treatment plan should be approved by the risk owners, who are the individuals or entities responsible for managing specific risks. In the scenario, the risk owner approved the decision to accept the risk of a potential ransomware attack and documented it in the risk treatment plan. This is consistent with the guidelines, which state that risk owners are responsible for deciding on risk treatment and approving the associated plans. Thus, option C is the correct answer.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27005:2018, Clause 8.6, "Risk Treatment," which emphasizes that risk treatment plans should be approved by the risk owners.

NEW QUESTION # 32
Scenario 8: Biotide is a pharmaceutical company that produces medication for treating different kinds of diseases. The company was founded in 1997, and since then it has contributed in solving some of the most challenging healthcare issues.
As a pharmaceutical company, Biotide operates in an environment associated with complex risks. As such, the company focuses on risk management strategies that ensure the effective management of risks to develop high-quality medication. With the large amount of sensitive information generated from the company, managing information security risks is certainly an important part of the overall risk management process. Biotide utilizes a publicly available methodology for conducting risk assessment related to information assets. This methodology helps Biotide to perform risk assessment by taking into account its objectives and mission. Following this method, the risk management process is organized into four activity areas, each of them involving a set of activities, as provided below.
1. Activity area 1: The organization determines the criteria against which the effects of a risk occurring can be evaluated. In addition, the impacts of risks are also defined.
2. Activity area 2: The purpose of the second activity area is to create information asset profiles. The organization identifies critical information assets, their owners, as well as the security requirements for those assets. After determining the security requirements, the organization prioritizes them. In addition, the organization identifies the systems that store, transmit, or process information.
3. Activity area 3: The organization identifies the areas of concern which initiates the risk identification process. In addition, the organization analyzes and determines the probability of the occurrence of possible threat scenarios.
4. Activity area 4: The organization identifies and evaluates the risks. In addition, the criteria specified in activity area 1 is reviewed and the consequences of the areas of concerns are evaluated. Lastly, the level of identified risks is determined.
The table below provides an example of how Biotide assesses the risks related to its information assets following this methodology:
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:

Which risk assessment methodology does Biotide use?

A. OCTAVE Allegro
B. MEHARI
C. OCTAVE-S

Answer: A

Explanation:
Biotide uses the OCTAVE Allegro methodology for risk assessment. This is determined based on the description of the activities mentioned in the scenario. OCTAVE Allegro is a streamlined approach specifically designed to help organizations perform risk assessments that are efficient and effective, particularly when handling information assets. The methodology focuses on a thorough examination of information assets, the threats they face, and the impact of those threats.
Activity Area 1: OCTAVE Allegro defines the criteria for evaluating the impact of risks, which is consistent with determining the risk effects' evaluation criteria in the scenario.
Activity Area 2: In OCTAVE Allegro, a critical step is creating profiles for information assets, identifying their owners, and determining security requirements. This aligns with the activity in which Biotide identifies critical assets, their owners, and their security needs.
Activity Area 3: Identifying areas of concern that initiate risk identification and analyzing threat scenarios is central to OCTAVE Allegro. This is reflected in the activity of identifying areas of concern and determining the likelihood of threats.
Activity Area 4: Evaluating the risks, reviewing criteria, and determining risk levels corresponds to the latter stages of OCTAVE Allegro, where risks are prioritized based on the likelihood and impact, and risk management strategies are formulated accordingly.
The steps outlined align with the OCTAVE Allegro approach, which focuses on understanding and addressing information security risks comprehensively and in line with organizational objectives. Hence, option A, OCTAVE Allegro, is the correct answer.
ISO/IEC 27005:2018 emphasizes the importance of using structured methodologies for information security risk management, like OCTAVE Allegro, to ensure that risks are consistently identified, assessed, and managed in accordance with organizational risk tolerance and objectives.

NEW QUESTION # 33
Scenario 6: Productscape is a market research company headquartered in Brussels, Belgium. It helps organizations understand the needs and expectations of their customers and identify new business opportunities. Productscape's teams have extensive experience in marketing and business strategy and work with some of the best-known organizations in Europe. The industry in which Productscape operates requires effective risk management. Considering that Productscape has access to clients' confidential information, it is responsible for ensuring its security. As such, the company conducts regular risk assessments. The top management appointed Alex as the risk manager, who is responsible for monitoring the risk management process and treating information security risks.
The last risk assessment conducted was focused on information assets. The purpose of this risk assessment was to identify information security risks, understand their level, and take appropriate action to treat them in order to ensure the security of their systems. Alex established a team of three members to perform the risk assessment activities. Each team member was responsible for specific departments included in the risk assessment scope. The risk assessment provided valuable information to identify, understand, and mitigate the risks that Productscape faces.
Initially, the team identified potential risks based on the risk identification results. Prior to analyzing the identified risks, the risk acceptance criteria were established. The criteria for accepting the risks were determined based on Productscape's objectives, operations, and technology. The team created various risk scenarios and determined the likelihood of occurrence as "low," "medium," or "high." They decided that if the likelihood of occurrence for a risk scenario is determined as "low," no further action would be taken. On the other hand, if the likelihood of occurrence for a risk scenario is determined as "high" or "medium," additional controls will be implemented. Some information security risk scenarios defined by Productscape's team were as follows:
1. A cyber attacker exploits a security misconfiguration vulnerability of Productscape's website to launch an attack, which, in turn, could make the website unavailable to users.
2. A cyber attacker gains access to confidential information of clients and may threaten to make the information publicly available unless a ransom is paid.
3. An internal employee clicks on a link embedded in an email that redirects them to an unsecured website, installing a malware on the device.
The likelihood of occurrence for the first risk scenario was determined as "medium." One of the main reasons that such a risk could occur was the usage of default accounts and password. Attackers could exploit this vulnerability and launch a brute-force attack. Therefore, Productscape decided to start using an automated "build and deploy" process which would test the software on deploy and minimize the likelihood of such an incident from happening. However, the team made it clear that the implementation of this process would not eliminate the risk completely and that there was still a low possibility for this risk to occur. Productscape documented the remaining risk and decided to monitor it for changes.
The likelihood of occurrence for the second risk scenario was determined as "medium." Productscape decided to contract an IT company that would provide technical assistance and monitor the company's systems and networks in order to prevent such incidents from happening.
The likelihood of occurrence for the third risk scenario was determined as "high." Thus, Productscape decided to include phishing as a topic on their information security training sessions. In addition, Alex reviewed the controls of Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 in order to determine the necessary controls for treating this risk. Alex decided to implement control A.8.23 Web filtering which would help the company to reduce the risk of accessing unsecure websites. Although security controls were implemented to treat the risk, the level of the residual risk still did not meet the risk acceptance criteria defined in the beginning of the risk assessment process. Since the cost of implementing additional controls was too high for the company, Productscape decided to accept the residual risk. Therefore, risk owners were assigned the responsibility of managing the residual risk.
Based on scenario 6, Productscape decided to accept the residual risk and risk owners were assigned the responsibility of managing this risk.
Based on the guidelines of ISO/IEC 27005, is this acceptable?

A. No, risk approvers are responsible for managing the residual risk after accepting it
B. No, the top management should manage the residual risk
C. Yes, risk owners must be aware of the residual risk and accept the responsibility for managing it

Answer: C

Explanation:
ISO/IEC 27005 specifies that once a risk treatment has been applied and residual risk remains, it is essential that the risk owner is aware of this residual risk and accepts the responsibility for managing it. The risk owner is the individual or entity accountable for managing specific risks within the organization. In Scenario 6, Productscape decided to accept the residual risk and assigned risk owners the responsibility for managing it, which is fully compliant with ISO/IEC 27005. Thus, the correct answer is A.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27005:2018, Clause 8.6, "Risk Treatment," which states that risk owners should be aware of and accept responsibility for managing residual risks.

NEW QUESTION # 34
Which of the following risk assessment methods provides an information security risk assessment methodology and involves three phases build asset-based threat profiles, identify infrastructure vulnerabilities, and develop security strategy and plans?

A. TRA
B. MEHARI
C. OCTAVE-S

Answer: C

Explanation:
OCTAVE-S (Operationally Critical Threat, Asset, and Vulnerability Evaluation for Small Organizations) is a risk assessment methodology tailored for small organizations. It provides a structured approach for identifying and managing information security risks. The OCTAVE-S method involves three main phases:
Building asset-based threat profiles, where critical assets and their associated threats are identified.
Identifying infrastructure vulnerabilities by assessing the organization's technological infrastructure for weaknesses that could be exploited by threats.
Developing security strategy and plans to address the identified risks and improve the overall security posture.
The OCTAVE-S method aligns with the description provided in the question, making it the correct answer. MEHARI and TRA are other risk assessment methods, but they do not specifically follow the three phases outlined above.

NEW QUESTION # 35
......

In this competitive society, being good at something is able to take up a large advantage, especially in the IT industry. Gaining some IT authentication certificate is very useful. PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager is a certification exam to test the IT professional knowledge level and has a Pivotal position in the IT industry. While PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager exam is very difficult to pass, so in order to pass the PECB certification ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager exam a lot of people spend a lot of time and effort to learn the related knowledge, but in the end most of them do not succeed. Therefore Exam4PDF is to analyze the reasons for their failure. The conclusion is that they do not take a pertinent training course. Now Exam4PDF experts have developed a pertinent training program for PECB Certification ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Exam, which can help you spend a small amount of time and money and 100% pass the exam at the same time.

Flexible ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Learning Mode: https://www.exam4pdf.com/ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager-dumps-torrent.html